Why I think the MG3 is trash

phantomforcesrelated
Tags: #<Tag:0x00007fa42af4d5f0>

#21

that was way before replies came


#22

Yeah right when I first read the post “this is my opinion“ wasn’t there


#23

None of these are really bad. Git gud.


#24

it just sucks , I main M60 and RPK (and the LSW)so it feels like a overweight PDW on crack.


#25

¯_(ツ)_/¯


#26

Fuck em up my d00d


#27

But an overweight PDW on crack is what makes it good.


#28

And makes it shit at range


#29

:clap: recoil :clap: control :clap:


#30

There is reason I use the 635 , than ever even thinking about buying the Mg3


#31

What the fuck.

Okay fuck this argument it’s not worth it. This is like trying to debate philosophy with a downy. I’m out.


#32

Are you dense or something? why would I use the MG3 when I have the 635 or a Mg36. with the 635 being a smg ,which is much lighter, and more pratical to use .


#33

The SMG sucks at range. The MG36 kinda sucks in CQC. The MG3 is a sort of fusion, and is amazing in CQC and good at range.


#34

Try this:RPK-12 With muzzle brake and folding works well at range but has a slight compromise at CQC that being the RPM is 700


#35

RPK 74 overshadows alllllll offffff youuuuuuuh REEeeeReerEeEeeeee


#36

Why are you always saying “are you dense”

Humans have the same density dipshit
Density stays constant on matter you can’t be more dense than another person


#37

Technically incorrect but point made.


#38

Well that depends on what the person is made of but
For a average person without mercury in their body it is theoretically correct


#39

t u m o r t i m e


#40

its good to get kills with it
hell to be killed by it